Thursday, November 20, 2014

Fortunately it was an Ashram, not a Madarsa: Media 'softness' on Sant Rampal, his guards' fight against State

A self-styled Godman's private security guards who are ready to fight the State government and its police, stopping them to enter the Ashram, by firing and throwing petrol bombs on them.

What could be more sensational for Indian media? Did it ever happen before? The scale of violence and the resistance towards police was simply mind-boggling.

It was surprising that the Ashram's guards were motivated enough to fight the police. Gunshots were being fired from within the Ashram at the policemen. This lasted for over a day.

The 'gunmen' or 'private army' was fighting the State. It can be termed treason or pure foolhardiness. But there were thousands of people including women and children inside the Hisar Ashram, during the operation.

Finally, six persons including a child died during the siege--either due to illness or possible injuries during the violence. Just think, when you had witnessed such a scene in independent India, before? An open defiance against the State, leading to an operation in which six people died, what's that?

Imagine, if it was not an Ashram, but a Madarsa. What'd have happened then? Wouldn't the media have begun speculating immediately about 'radical ideology', 'links', 'modules', taking names of obscure organisations & opining about 'jehadis infiltration' in the community?

In fact, any other act of much lesser magnitude in urban India, would have immediately drawn national attention. TV channels would have gone ballistic, with their vocabulary. Self-styled security experts would have gathered on talk shows, talking about threat to nation.

In fact, there would have been immediate call to send NIA-ATS squads and storming the place by taking the personnel through helicopters. Cases under the draconian laws would have been slapped, immediately. Have they used UAPA in this case, yet!

No newspaper or TV channel even bothers to talk about it. Thank God, it wasn't a madarsa. In fact, ,omds have been modulated to such an extent that a law-and-order problem that should be dealt with promptly, is handled differently depending on these factors.

Just recall the figure of those injured: over 100 policemen suffered injuries in the attack by Ashram's men. In a country, where a gunshot fired on a security personnel, is enough to cause ripples, this incident--though getting media coverage, didn't cause much alarm.

Journalists were injured when police allegedly targeted them. But one must say that the police didn't act irresponsibly at all. In fact, it was far far cautious, when one looks at the police role in similar situations otherwise.

After injury to policemen, they generally use more force. But here, even facing bullets and petrol bombs, police didn't fire recklessly, and instead used water cannons. There were announcements and appeals to the 'Baba'. Otherwise, ordinary protesters or those pelting stones get shot in other places.

The use of force and the magnitude of media coverage are different. The operation in Hisar, has left lot of questions unanswered. In fact, it also tells a lot about inaction of the local police and intelligence.

Role of local police, security officials

Were intelligence agencies were not aware that the Ashram had such committed guards, who can go against the state? Or, if they were aware, why action was not taken earlier? The tragedy, especially, the deaths could have been avoided.

Also, when there was court summon and it was known that 'Saint' Rampal was gathering supporters to use as 'human shield', no intervention was made earlier. It'd have been easy to nab him then. But thousands were allowed to gather inside the huge Ashram, which finally led to the violent showdown.

Finally it's good that Rampal is arrested and will now face the law. He is behind the bars and may be convicted. Time for media persons to introspect. Also, for the state. The fact is that all law-and-order situations should be dealt with firmly (and promptly) and with similar response, without any prejudices.


Tuesday, March 04, 2014

Why newspaper managements are worried after Supreme court upholds Majithia wage board's validity?

Since the Supreme Court has upheld the validity of the Majithia wage board, the owners of the newspapers are worried.

The reason is that they will have to give due salaries to the staff which was denied by them earlier with the connivance of 'Managers'.

The management of most newspapers cleverly forced journalists to take up contract. But once most journalists came on contract, the salaries were not revised.

The basic salary remained the same for years. The reason was that newspaper managements are run by the managers who get salaries in tens of lakhs, even crores.

How can newspapers who sell for Rs 2-5 bear such extravagant salaries? This was managed by the Human Resources (HR) wings of each company, which hired editors at huge salaries. Now the editors were in the bracket of top managers.

As editors were happy getting sky-rocketing raises on their salaries, they became puppets of the management. They turned tough and insensitive towards the rest of the staff. To justify their salaries and keep their own job, editors listened to whatever the management asked them to do.




So a manager who does nothing in sales, gets Rs 5 lakh per month, but a journalist who is the mainstay of the newspaper, gets Rs 10,000-Rs 15,000 or in some papers Rs 25,000-50,000. Some get even less than Rs 10,000 in their companies.

The editor is always ready to sign any order of retrenchment because he or she needs HR's goodwill to continue their job. These changes took place in Indian media industry from late 90s, and at a fast speed after the year 2000.

The nexus of HR managers and editors, hurt journalists badly. Journalism is the lone industry where the person who practices it gets the least salary. Vice-presidents and managers get huge amount of money. To keep this flow, journalists are sacked or their salaries not increased.

The Majithia wage board intends to correct this anomaly. But will the management let it go easily? Only time will tell. There are attempts to find out a way so that the companies don't have to pay the increased salaries to journalists.

Some newspaper organisations are trying to turn their contract employees as 'employees hired through placement agencies' to avoid paying money. Others are trying different ways. Everyone is thinking whether the recommendations will be implemented?

For now, read about the Apex court judgment and other ramifications at the website of Indian Journalist Union. The recommendations are available at this link on the same website.


About This Blog

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by 2008

Back to TOP